Legal Opinion
State v. Palkimas
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 13, 1966PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.
Each of the two defendants was charged in a single count with receiving stolen goods of a value in excess of $250 but less than $2000 in violation of § 53-65 of the General Statutes, quoted in the footnote.1
The cases were tried together to the court, and each defendant was found guilty. The sole ground of appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to support the court’s conclusion of guilt. Thus, the only question is whether, on the evidence, the court could properly conclude that the state had proven guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
There was ample evidence that the two defendants, Peter P.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- People v. . GalboNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- State v. PambianchiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. RuscoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. Anonymous (83-FG)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. RaffoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.