Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 26, 1994No. 13224; 13225; 13226PublishedCited by 194 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

These consolidated criminal appeals from the imposition of the death penalty upon the defendant, Michael B. Ross, raise numerous issues concerning the validity of his capital felony convictions and the validity of the procedures that resulted in death sentences for each of these convictions.1 After a trial to *188determine guilt, a jury convicted the defendant of six counts of capital felony2 in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54b.3 At a separate sentencing hearing pur*189suant to General Statutes § 53a-46a,4 the same jury considered further evidence and found an aggravating *190factor and no…

2Cases cited232 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by194 opinions

  1. Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API