Legal Opinion
State v. Pambianchi
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 24, 1953PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The defendant was convicted in a trial to the jury of the crime of receiving stolen goods, and he has appealed.
Of the several errors assigned, we shall consider first the denial by the trial court of the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict. The jury could reasonably have found these facts: The defendant conducted a used-car business in Ridgefield. A few days prior to April 7,1950, Oscar Gregorius, a representative of Arthur Geller, a used-car dealer on Long Island, called on the defendant and inquired concerning used cars for sale. He gave the defendant the name and address of his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- State v. EnannoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- State v. HenoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- State v. WeinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- State v. PikulSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.