Legal Opinion
Nucholls v. Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 7, 1977No. 47854PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Vice Chief Justice.
The question presented is the validity of a portion of the Tulsa, Okla.Rev.Ord., Title 42, Ch. 14, § 1470.1 (1969) 1 which prohibits the granting of a principal use variance.
Don Nucholls and Lee Rhodes, d/b/a Zodiac Real Estate Company, appellees, sought a variance authorizing the operation of a real estate office in a zoning district established exclusively for residential purposes. The Tulsa Board of Adjustment (Board) unanimously ruled it did not have jurisdiction under the ordinance to grant a principal use variance. Appellees appealed to the district court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Walton, Mayor v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Ex Parte HiggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- Moriarty v. PoznerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- City of Oklahoma City v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Oklahoma City v. BarclaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 382Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Stump v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Vinson v. MedleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Mustang Run Wind Project, LLC v. Osage County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.