Legal Opinion
Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 8, 1994No. 92-1326PublishedCited by 346 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
This is a patent infringement case in which we are called upon to determine whether the district, court properly declined to exercise personal jurisdiction over foreign (from the standpoint of the forum) accused infringers or whether, applying the stream of commerce theory, plaintiff made the required jurisdictional showing. Beverly Hills Fan Company (Beverly) appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Civil Action No. 91-1834-A), dated March 6, 1992, dismissing Beverly’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction over…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by346 opinions
- Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American BuddhaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Red Wing Shoe Company, Inc. v. Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Alpine View Co Ltd v. Atlas Copco ABCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- The Akro Corporation v. Ken LukerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
341 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.