Legal Opinion
Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 16, 1991No. 90-5481PublishedCited by 305 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
Dakota Industries, Inc., appeals from the district court’s dismissal of its trademark infringement claim against Dakota Sportswear, Inc., for lack of personal jurisdiction and venue. On appeal, Dakota Industries argues that the court can exercise jurisdiction under the tort accrual provision of the South Dakota long-arm statute, that Sportswear’s contacts with South Dakota are sufficient to satisfy due process requirements, and that venue is proper because Dakota Sportswear can be deemed to “reside” in South Dakota under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c) (1988). We reverse the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by305 opinions
- Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Robert S. Boit v. Gar-Tec Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Darrell J. Bird v. Marshall Parsons, Stephen Vincent, George Decarlo, Dotster, Inc., and afternic.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Republic of Panama v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
300 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.