Legal Opinion
Neil Bros. Ltd. v. World Wide Lines, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 4, 2006No. 05-CV-1198 (ADS)(ATK)PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
This case involves a patent dispute that arose between Neil Brothers Limited (“Neil Brothers” or the “plaintiff’), World Wide Lines, Inc. (“World Wide” or the “defendant”), and APS Promotional Solutions, Inc. (“APS”) regarding the manufacture and sale of novelty drinking mugs that change in appearance when a hot liquid is poured into them. On January 21, 2006, the Court entered a default judgment against APS and referred the matter to United States Magistrate Judge James Orenstein to determine the amount of damages, including reasonable…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Filmline (Cross-Country) Productions, Inc. And Yellowbill Finance Limited v. United Artists CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Francis Schertenleib v. Jerome S. TraumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Ricoh Co., Ltd. v. Honeywell, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- New York Marine & General Insurance v. Lafarge North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- In Re Nintendo Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- EasyWeb Innovations, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Zaltz v. JDATEDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Jetblue Airways Corp. v. Helferich Patent Licensing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.