Legal Opinion

United States v. Konieczka

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 26, 1990No. ACMR 9000001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT

NEURAUTER, Judge:

Pursuant to Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862 (Supp. II 1984) [hereinafter UCMJ], and Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, Rule for Courts-Martial [hereinafter R.C.M.] 908(b) the government appeals a ruling by the military judge in this case suppressing the results of a urinalysis test which implicate appellee. These test results are essential evidence with respect to the Specification and Charge alleging wrongful use of marijuana in violation of Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a.

I

Appellee submitted a urine sample…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. JohnstonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. LawUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. KonieczkaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. KonieczkaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API