Legal Opinion

United States v. Konieczka

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 28, 1990No. Misc. No. 90-16; ACMR Misc. No. 9000001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge:

On November 21, 1989, appellant was arraigned before a military judge sitting alone as a special court-martial at Fort Lee, Virginia, on a single specification of wrongful use of marijuana, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 912a. Before entry of pleas, the military judge granted appellant’s motion to suppress evidence derived from the testing of his urine specimen. Government counsel filed an appeal under Article 62, UCMJ, 10 USC § 862, challenging the military judge’s ruling. The Court of Military Review granted this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. CampbellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. BrownU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
  3. United States v. TimoneyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API