Legal Opinion
Waterman v. Transport Workers' Union Local 100
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 17, 1998No. 97 Civ. 8830(SAS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed an action in New York state court on October 27, 1997, asserting claims for breach of fair representation by defendant Transport Workers’ Union Local 100 and legal malpractice by defendants Malcolm Goldstein and O’Donnell Schwartz Glanstein & Rosen. Defendants removed the action to federal court' on November 26, 1997. On February 23, 1998 defendants moved for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion is granted.
I. Legal Standard for Summary Judgment
A motion for summary judgment may be granted only if “the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kaur v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Pack v. ArtuzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Friends of Falun Gong v. Pacific Cultural Enterprise, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Andre Waterman v. Transport Workers' Union Local 100, Malcolm Goldstein and O'donnel, Schwartz, Glanstein & RosenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Dimensional Music Publishing, LLC v. Kersey Ex Rel. Estate of KerseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.