Legal Opinion

People v. Richardson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 1937No. Crim. 3034PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Defendant was convicted after trial by jury of murder in tlie second degree. From the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial he appeals. There is also a purported appeal from the verdict and sentence.

Viewing the evidence most favorable to the prosecution (People v. Dukes, 90 Cal. App. 657, 659 [266 Pac. 558]), the facts are these:

June 11, 1937, at about 1 o’clock in the morning, while Roy Brown, Miss Gertrude Brown, defendant, his wife, and others were riding in defendant’s automobile, Roy Brown and defendant engaged in an argument over the amount of gasoline then in the car.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. De MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Thatch v. LivingstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. People v. DukesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. People v. GrovesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. People v. ArrangoizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. People v. BolesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API