Legal Opinion

People v. Boles

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1939No. Crim. 3261PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J. —

From judgments convicting them of violating the Corporate Securities Act after trial before a jury and from orders denying their motions for a new trial defendants appeal. There are also purported appeals from the verdicts of the jury.

Viewing the evidence most favorable to the prosecution (respondent) the essential facts are:

Defendant Boles was president and defendant Armstrong secretary of Santa Fe Royal O'il Company, a corporation. April 17, 1936, the company borrowed $4,000 from John Marcin and delivered to Mm a note signed 11 Santa Fe Royal Oil Company by M. L. Boles,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance Co. v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. WhelptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. OttermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Haddad v. Electronic Production & Development, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API