Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 9, 2002No. 9906-45981; A108485PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for, among other things, reckless driving, ORS 811.140, based on an incident in which he was skateboarding on a public street. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal on the ground that a skateboard is not a “vehicle” within the meaning of ORS 811.140. The state argues that defendant’s argument is not preserved and that, in any event, a skateboard is a “vehicle” within the meaning of the statute. We conclude that the issue was preserved and that a skateboard is not a “vehicle” within the meaning of ORS…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Krieger v. JustOregon Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Clinical Research Institute v. Kemper Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. Board of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. State v. RumlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API