Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 23, 2005No. 02CF037; A123653PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Defendant appeals from his convictions, based on a plea of no contest, on one count of rape in the first degree, ORS 163.275, one count of sodomy in the first degree, ORS 163.405, and one count of sexual abuse in the third degree, ORS 163.415. He argues that the trial court’s imposition of consecutive 100-month sentences on the first-degree rape and first-degree sodomy counts, based on the court’s rendition of findings under ORS 137.123(5), 1 was unconstitutional. In particular, defendant contends that, under the rationale set forth in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 US 466, 120 S Ct 2348, 147 L…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. State v. RennellsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. RumlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. BOARDMASTER CORPORATION v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Barnes v. City of HillsboroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API