Legal Opinion
Sutherland v. Gross
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1989No. 19070PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
FACTS
All parties in this case at one time had a property interest in the Desert Pines Apartments, also known as the Fremont Arms Apartments (Apartments). Respondent Earl Gross, as trustee for Las Vegas 70, Ltd., Exchange Trust, entered into a contract to sell the Apartments to respondents Jack and Penny Copeland. Because the sale involved a real estate installment contract, Las Vegas 70 retained legal title to the Apartments.
On November 13, 1984, the Copelands conveyed the Apartments to appellant Richard Sutherland by way of a subcontract of sale. On that same date, the Copelands…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Collins v. Union Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Ramona Manor Convalescent Hospital v. Care EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Leavitt v. Leisure Sports IncorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Kooper v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Paul v. PoolNevada Supreme Court · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by44 opinions
- Nationwide Transport Finance v. Cass Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Consolidated Generator-Nevada, Inc. v. Cummins Engine Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Dow Chemical Co. v. MahlumNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- J.J. Industries, LLC v. BennettNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Alam v. Reno Hilton Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1993
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.