Legal Opinion
Nationwide Transport Finance v. Cass Information Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 28, 2008No. 06-15653PublishedCited by 174 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge IKUTA; Dissent by Judge NOONAN.
*1054IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Nationwide Transport Finance (Nationwide) appeals the district court’s judgment following a jury verdict in favor of defendant-appellee Cass Information Systems, Inc. (Cass) on Nationwide’s claims for intentional interference with contractual relationship, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, breach of implied contract, and account stated. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I
Prior to trial, the parties agreed to the basic facts underlying this dispute:
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Jones v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Gloria Ann MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Troy Swinton v. Potomac Corporation, Dba Crescent Cardboard Company, Dba crescent/u.s. MatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Scott Peckham v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co., Scott Peckham v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by174 opinions
- United States v. Anthony GadsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. James LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Range Road Music, Inc. v. East Coast Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Jesus BarraganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Huawei Techs., Co. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.