Legal Opinion

Leavitt v. Leisure Sports Incorporation

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1987No. 15324PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*83OPINION

By the Court,

Gunderson, C. J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment whereby the district court determined appellants had failed to prove, to the court’s satisfaction, that respondents had been guilty of actionable conduct. We cannot fault the district court’s findings and, therefore, affirm the judgment.

The Facts

Conrad and Amy Koning (the Konings) determined that an area of Mount Holly, Utah, had potential for development as a ski resort. In 1969, they formed Leisure Sports Incorporation (LSI) and negotiated with the State of Utah for a lease of the state owned land.

Jack and Dorothy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Bendix Corp. v. AdamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Klinicki v. LundgrenOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Udevco, Inc. v. WagnerNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Western Industries, Inc. v. General Insurance Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Consolidated Generator-Nevada, Inc. v. Cummins Engine Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Giles v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Mikohn Gaming Corporation v. Acres Gaming, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. In Re Amerco Derivative LitigationNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Wichinsky v. MosaNevada Supreme Court · 1993

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API