Legal Opinion

Fallini v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 8, 1995No. 94-5110PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

In this Fifth Amendment “takings” case, the Fallinis, who are engaged in cattle ranching in Nevada, argue that the federal government has taken personal property from them without compensation. The Fallinis contend that the government effected a “taking” by requiring them to provide water to wild horses living in the area in which the Fallinis conducted their ranching activities. The Court of Federal Claims ruled against the Fallinis, concluding on motion for summary judgment that they had no property right that was taken by governmental action. Fallini v. United States,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. WILCOX v. the Executors of PlummerSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Boling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. Ariadne Financial Services Pty. Ltd. And Memvale Pty. Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Cottrell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. Lengen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API