Legal Opinion
M. Maropakis Carpentry, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 17, 2010No. 2009-5024PublishedCited by 242 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
This action arises under the Contract Disputes Act (“CDA”), 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613. M. Maropakis Carpentry, Inc. (“Maropakis”) appeals the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing Maropakis’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because it failed to present to the contracting officer a “claim” within the meaning of the CDA. Maropakis further appeals the grant of the government’s counterclaim for liquidated damages. Because Maropakis has demonstrated no errors of law or clearly erroneous factual findings, we affirm.
Background
On April 6,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Reflectone, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by242 opinions
- K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Township of Saddle Brook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Todd Construction, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Peninsula Group Capital Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Northrop Grumman Computing Systems, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
237 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.