Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hauswald v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

The complaint alleges that on or about June 15, 1924, the Metro Flower Manufacturing Corporation duly executed and delivered to the plaintiff its certain promissory notes. Further, it alleges by paragraph 3:

“ That contemporaneously with the delivery to plaintiff of said notes the defendants made and delivered to plaintiff their written guaranty of payment of said notes, of which the following is a copy:
*93“ Durr & Hauswald,
“ Sebnitz, Sachsen, Germany:
“ Gentlemen.— We, the undersigned, hereby agree to pay the following notes, made out by the Metro Flower Mfg. Corp.

531.92...................... due…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Church v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Meyer v. . HunekeNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Hoffstaedter v. Carlton Auto Supplies Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. AXA Investment Managers UK Ltd. v. Endeavor Capital Management LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Lakhaney v. AnzeloneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  3. American Management Corp. v. DunlapDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1992
  4. Pink v. MeyerNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Oltarsh v. Turf Broadway, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API