Legal Opinion
Meyer v. . Huneke
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 20, 1874PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] At the time of the giving of the note for $1,000, there was no subsisting indebtedness from the plaintiff to the defendant for that sum. The contract of March 13, 1866, so far as related to that $1,000, still remained executory, and the right of the plaintiff to that sum was contingent upon the renewal of the lease. The contract did not call for the giving of the note, but the note and receipt were a modification of the contract made while it continued…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blade v. NolandNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- Clute v. SmallNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Trow v. Glen Cove Starch Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1863
3Cited by19 opinions
- Booth v. . PowersNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Crawford v. . West Side BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Town of Solon v. Williamsburgh Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Hauswald v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Martin v. . Tradesmen's Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.