Legal Opinion

Lakhaney v. Anzelone

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 30, 1992No. 91 Civ. 2234 (RLC)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Nari Lakhaney brings this diversity action to enforce two guarantees of payment (“the guarantees”) allegedly executed by defendants James Anzelone and Bart Tarulli. The guarantees were for payment of a promissory note (“the note”) executed in favor of plaintiff by 5550 Corp. Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment under Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P. Defendants have not opposed the motion.

FACTS

On March 8, 1990, 5550 Corp., a New York corporation, executed the promissory note in favor of the plaintiff, a New Jersey resident, as evidence of a loan…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Compania De Inversiones Internacionales v. Industrial Mortgage Bank of FinlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hadar v. Concordia Yacht Builders, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Export-Import Bank of the United States v. Agricola Del Mar BCS, S.A. De C.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  3. AXA Investment Managers UK Ltd. v. Endeavor Capital Management LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  4. MM ARIZONA HOLDINGS LLC v. BonannoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  5. Cavendish Traders, Ltd. v. Nice Skate Shoes, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API