Legal Opinion
Hoffstaedter v. Carlton Auto Supplies Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 17, 1922PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Merrell, J.:
This action is brought by the plaintiff, Hugo Hoffstaedter, to recover upon a promissory note claimed to have been made by the defendants Carlton Auto Supplies Co., Inc., and Sam Lichtenstein for the sum of $6,393.75, and which note was indorsed by the defendant William Lee. The plaintiff was a dealer in auto tires, and the note was given to secure the payment of a part of the purchase price of a quantity of tires sold by the plaintiff to the defendant Carlton Auto Supplies Co., Inc. The note was in the following form:
“ 6393 75 /100 October 31si, 1921.
“ On December 3rd, 1921 we…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. SiefkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hauswald v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Norman v. BelingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Murphy v. Reimann Furniture Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Star Dairy, Inc. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- First State Bank of Denton v. Smoot-Curtis Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.