Legal Opinion
Pink v. Meyer
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1936No. 2PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLatter, J.
The plaintiff in this action seeks to recover against the defendant Jacob S. Meyer pursuant to the terms of an indemnity agreement. The Concord Casualty and Surety Company, now in liquidation, executed and delivered its guaranty bond to the Trade Bank of New York on February 3, 1930. The defendant Jacob S. Meyer, by the terms of the indemnity agreement herein sued upon, dated March 6, 1930, guaranteed that bond. The Concord Casualty and Surety Company subsequently was forced to pay upon its bond in an amount sought to be recovered in this action.
The defendant contends that no consideration…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Utica City National Bank v. GunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Hauswald v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. DanzigerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pink v. MeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Barnes v. BeaumontSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- GOLLOBITH v. FerrellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- American Express Bank, Ltd. v. Spire Puerto Rico, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Cohen v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938