O. H. Perry Tie & Lumber Co. v. Reynolds & Bro.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Court of Law and Chancery of the city of Norfolk, rendered October 4, 1900, in an action of assumpsit wherein the plaintiff in error was the plaintiff, and the defendants in error were the defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
About the 20th of August, 1898, the plaintiffs in error, who were the plaintiffs in the trial court, entered into a contract with the defendants by which they undertook to furnish two bills of lumber, one for forty thousand feet, and the other for • about one hundred and thirty thousand feet, all to be delivered within thirty days at a wharf on James River on board of vessels to be provided by the defendants. Rone of the lumber was delivered within the time fixed by contract. The smaller bill was delivered on the 4th of October, in time for the purpose for which it was ordered, and about it…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- The Maggie HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Booth v. . Spuyten Duyvil Rolling Mill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. HarmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- Richmond Leather Manufacturing Co. v. FawcettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Virginia Public Service Co. v. SteindlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
- Long v. American Surety Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- J. P. Smith Shoe Co. v. Curme-Feltman Shoe Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.