Legal Opinion

The Maggie Hammond

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 25, 1870PublishedCited by 103 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maryland, the facts of the case, so far as they presented questions which were passed on by the judgment of the court, having been these: On the 23d of August, 1866, the Maggie Hammond, a British vessel, being then at Androssan, Scotland, and owned by a British subject domiciled in Nova Scotia, took on board for Morland & Co., British subjects also, residents of Montreal, Canada, a cargo of iron, to be transported from Androssan to Montreal.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maryland, the facts of the case, so far as they presented questions which were passed on by the judgment of the court, having been these: On the 23d of August, 1866, the Maggie Hammond, a British vessel, being then at Androssan, Scotland, and owned by a British subject domiciled in Nova Scotia, took on board for Morland & Co., British subjects also, residents of Montreal, Canada, a cargo of iron, to be transported from Androssan to Montreal. The bill of lading was in ¡the usual form. The vessel, in consequence of stress of weather, which damaged her…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clifford

Common carriers by water, like common carriers by land, in the absence of any legislative provisions prescribing a different rule, are insurers of goods shipped, and are liable in all events and for every loss and damage, however occasioned, unless it happens from the act of God or the public enemy, or by the act of the shipper, or from some other cause or accident expressly excepted in the bill of lading.

Whenever the goods intended for transportation are ship ped on board, or delivered to the carrier or his agent for that purpose, it is the duty of the master, in the absence of any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The AuroraSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  2. The JerusalemU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1814
  3. The HavanaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1838
  4. Read v. Hull of a New BrigU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1840

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. American Dredging Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API