Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Rand

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 1, 1929No. 27,298PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action for deceit, wherein plaintiffs appeal from an order sustaining the general demurrers of defendants Bernard P. Rand and Nadine L. Rand, husband and wife. There is no pretense on this appeal that a cause of action is stated against the latter, and we shall refer to Bernard P. Rand as if he were the only defendant.

The action arises out of the purchase by plaintiffs from defendant of an apartment building in St. Paul. The complaint alleges that defendant agreed to purchase the lot and erect the building “at the actual cost of the purchase of said lot plus the actual cost of constructing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Schlechter v. FeltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Alden v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Kirby v. DeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Anderson v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Twin Ports Oil Co. v. WhitesideSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Dupont v. HaggardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API