Twin Ports Oil Co. v. Whiteside
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
This was a suit to set aside a sheriff’s certificate of sale upon foreclosure by advertisement of a real estate mortgage. Defendants Arthur W. King, Jr. and the Woodruff Lumber Company demurred upon the ground that the complaint “does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against either of them.” The court sustained the demurrer. Plaintiff made no move to amend, and judgment was entered, from which plaintiff appealed.
We gather from the complaint these facts: Prior to 1930, defendant Whiteside acquired title to the premises involved. During that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hollister v. UlviSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Hutchins v. BassinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Baker v. HabedankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Bryant v. RandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Hardin County Savings Bank v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of the City of BrainerdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Leonard, Street & Deinard v. Marquette AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000