Alden v. Wright
Supreme Court of Minnesota
■ . Appeal by 'plaintiff from an order of the district court for Henne-■fpin county, Hicks, L, presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict for ■defendants, in an action to recover $10,000 damages for alleged de>ceit in an exchange of property.
1Opinion of the Court
'Collins, J.
The verdict in this action was for defendants, and plaintiff appeals from an order denying a new trial. From an examination of the bill of exceptions it is obvious that the testimony upon all of the main features of the controversy was very conflicting, and would have justified a verdict for either party. The appellant does not contend that the verdict was unsupported by the evidence, but claims that the court committed several errors when charging the jury. It is necessary to consider but two of the assignments of error. .The action was for deceit. The plaintiff exchanged certain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor v. . GuestNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Busterud v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Redding v. GodwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Nye v. MerriamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
- Doran v. EatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Fargo Gas & Coke Co. v. Fargo Gas & Electric Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Sonnesyn v. AkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Berg v. Xerxes-Southdale Office Building Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Wallace v. HallowellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.