Legal Opinion
Kirby v. Dean
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 29, 1924No. 24,006PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action on a promissory note evidencing the promise of defendants to pay .plaintiffs the first premium on three policies of life insurance issued, one to each of them, through the instrumentality of plain*452tiffs as agents for the insurer. Defense, that the policies were fraudulently misrepresented and that, in consequence, defendants rescinded their agreement to accept the same and promptly returned them to the insurer. After a verdict for plaintiffs, defendants moved for a new trial. It is from the denial of their motion that this appeal is taken.
The alleged misrepresentation was to the effect…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Knappen v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Wilson v. New United States Cattle-Ranch Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- MacLaren v. CochranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Ludowese v. AmidonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Spiess v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- E. Edelman & Co. v. Queen Stove Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Proper v. ProperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Saupe v. St. Paul Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Hirschman v. HealySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.