Legal Opinion
In re Complaint of Buckeye Energy Brokers v. Palmer Energy Co. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 2014No. 2012-0668PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
Summary
{¶ 1} This is an appeal of an order of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (“the commission” or “PUCO”) that determined that intervening appellee, Palmer Energy Company, an energy-management and consulting firm, did not violate R.C. 4928.08 and 4929.20. These provisions require any entity that intends to provide competitive retail service for electricity or natural gas to obtain a certificate to operate before providing that service. R.C. 4928.08(B) (certification for competitive retail electric service) and 4929.20(A) (certification for competitive retail natural-gas service). The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ohio Contract Carriers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Application of Champaign Wind, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- In Re Application Seeking Approval of Ohio Power Company's Proposal to Enter Into an Affiliate Power Purchase Agreement for Inclusion in the Power Purchase Agreement RiderOhio Supreme Court · 2018
- Biglin v. S (In re Black Fork Wind Energy, L. L.C.)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- In re Application of Black Fork Wind Energy, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- In re Establishing the Solar Generation Fund RiderOhio Supreme Court · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.