Legal Opinion

Ohio Contract Carriers Ass'n v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1942No. 29025 and 29120PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

It is fundamental that appeal lies only ■ on behalf of a party aggrieved. Unless an appellant can show that his rights have been invaded, no error is shown to have been committed by the court or body which entered the final order.

As stated in 2 American Jurisprudence, 941, Section 149:

“It is a fundamental rule that to be entitled to institute appeal or error proceedings a person must have a present interest in the subject-matter of the litigation and must be aggrieved or prejudiced by the judgment, order or decree.”

In Section 150, ibid, it is said:

“A cardinal principle which applies alike to…

2Cited by127 opinions

  1. Estado Libre Asociado v. AguayoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
  2. State v. Bates (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. City of Willoughby Hills v. C. C. Bar's Sahara, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Dayton-Montgomery County Port Authority v. Montgomery County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Ohio Savings Bank v. AmbroseOhio Supreme Court · 1990

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API