Bryant v. Matvieshen
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
ANTHONY W. ISHII, Chief Judge.
I. History
The' factual background of this case is complex. There are four active complaints: the original, two counterclaims, and a counterclaim to a counterclaim These complaints appear to contain some inconsistent facts.
In 2009, Jack Deliddo (“Deliddo”) formed Rooftop Energy, LLC (“Rooftop”), a company specializing in large scale commercial solar projects. Doc. 4, Complaint, ¶ 8. Shortly thereafter, Deliddo sold a 51% interest in Rooftop to Charles Bryant (“Bryant”). Doc. 4, Complaint, ¶ 9. Plaintiffs entered into…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Department of Parks and Re-Creation for the State of California v. Bazaar Del Mundo Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Park Village Apartment Tenants Ass'n v. Mortimer Howard TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Lockheed Missile & Space Co. v. Hughes Aircraft Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arcsoft, Inc. v. Cyberlink Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Ingrid & Isabel, LLC v. Baby Be Mine, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Betancourt v. Total Property ManagementDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022