Legal Opinion
Betancourt v. Total Property Management
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 23, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00033Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CESAR A. BETANCOURT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00033-JLT-EPG 11 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 v. (ECF No. 6) 13 TOTAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff Cesar A. Betancourt is proceeding pro se in this civil action, generally alleging 17 that Defendant Total Property Management has violated the “CARES Act” by “push[ing]” his 18 wife to move out of the house in the middle of the pandemic and while she was recovering from a 19 stroke. (ECF No. 1, p. 5). After Plaintiff failed to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Glossip v. GrossSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.