Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Nettleton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 22, 1918No. 8767PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Prank Mathews, Judge. Proceeding by other against Arthur E. Nettleton and W. I>. Herndon to vacate a default judgment foreclosing a mortgage. Judgment for the defendants, dismissing the petition, motion for new trial overruled, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

This is a proceeding instituted by plaintiffs in error, who will hereinafter be called plaintiffs, against defendants in error, who will hereinafter be called defendants, to set aside a judgment entered against plaintiffs by default in the district court of Kiowa county on the 8th day of February, 1912, for the sum of $650, attorney's fees and costs and to foreclose mortgage on the northwest quarter of section 8, township 2 north, range 17 west, and located in said county.

It appears that on the 2nd day of November, 1905, there was filed in the district court at Kiowa county, by defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. NettletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. McLaughlin v. NettletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tippins v. TurbenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Anderson v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Bearman v. BrackenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. American Bank of Commerce v. ChavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Grayson v. StithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API