Legal Opinion

Nash v. Treat

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1912No. 3,098PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Gallatin County; W. R. C. Stewart, Judge. ActioN by Frank L. Nash against D. E. Treat and another. From an order setting aside a default judgment, plaintiff appeals. Cause submitted on briefs of counsel.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

Appeal from an order setting aside a default and judgment. The complaint contains two causes of action. The first is against the defendant D. E. Treat, and seeks recovery upon a promissory aote executed by him and delivered to the plaintiff under date of November 6, 1907, for $183.55, and due six months after date, with interest at ten per cent per annum, less a credit of $20.02. It provides for a reasonable attorney’s fee, and it is alleged that $50 is a just allowance on this behalf. The second cause of action is against both defendants, and seeks recovery for the principal sum mentioned in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Modern Woodmen of America v. ComeauxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Pengelly v. PeelerMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Morse v. CallantineMontana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Benedict v. SpendiffMontana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Eakins v. KemperMontana Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Brothers v. BrothersMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Busser v. NobleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  3. Southwestern Surety Ins. v. TreadwayMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Reynolds v. Gladys Belle Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. McCormick v. McCormickMontana Supreme Court · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API