Legal Opinion

Brown v. Purvin

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 17, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

The plaintiff has applied for an injunction pendente lite restraining the defendant from selling any used typewriters at prices in excess of those established by Maximum Price Regulation No. 162, as-amended.

The defendant, one of the largest dealers-of used typewriters in the country, sold 140 typewriters on Sept. 4, 1942, to Typomatic Service of Boston, Massachusetts, at a price-of $41.67 each. The maximum wholesale-price fixed by the Office of Price Administration for these typewriters was $34.17' each. The defendant contends that the sale-in question was at retail…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ohio Oil Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. Park & Tilford Import Corp. v. Hunter Baltimore Rye, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Libby, McNeill & LibbyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1951
  2. Bowles v. Federal Poultry Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API