Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Federal Poultry Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 10, 1944No. Civil Action No. 3692PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
INCH, District Judge.
This is a motion for a temporary injunction in a civil suit for treble damages and a permanent injunction. The suit and the motion are based upon alleged violations of the Emergency Price Control Act, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix § 901 et seq., and the regulations pursuant thereto as amended, etc. The defendant denies any such violations.
Pursuant to a stipulation a similar motion in similar suits of Chester Bowles, etc., against the Sahn Poultry Corp., The S. S. & B. Live Poultry Corp., Samuel Werner, Inc., Michael Garlick & Sons Inc., Sol. Frankel, Inc., David A. Gordon,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hall Signal Co. v. General Ry. Signal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- National Commodities Co. v. ViretCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Brown v. SacherDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Mitchell v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1902
- Brown v. PurvinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bowles v. Swift & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944