Legal Opinion
Park & Tilford Import Corp. v. Hunter Baltimore Rye, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 17, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The suit is in equity to enjoin the defendants from using the name “Hunter Baltimore Rye.” The plaintiff has moved for a preliminary injunction.
The facts are not in serious dispute. Pri- or to national prohibition the firm of William Lanahan & Son of Baltimore manufactured and sold whisky under the trade-mark “Hunter Baltimore Rye.” The product was famous and the trade-mark valuable. The manufacture and sale ceased with the coming of prohibition. The trade-mark and good will of the business were owned by the estate of Catherine C. Lanahan. In the summer of 1933 it…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Allison v. CorsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Wilmington City Ry. Co. v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chips 'N Twigs, Inc. v. Blue Jeans Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Huber Baking Co. v. Stroehmann Bros. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Brown v. PurvinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Heffle v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Heffle v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.