Legal Opinion

United States v. Libby, McNeill & Libby

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided August 9, 1951No. 6445-APublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLTA, District Judge.

By this suit the plaintiff, acting on behalf of the Indians of the Hydaburg Indian Reservation in Alaska, seeks to enjoin the defendant from fishing in the waters of the reservation and pending trial has renewed its application for a preliminary injunction. Upon the first hearing, plaintiff’s motion for 'such an injunction was denied on May 21, 1951, without prejudice because defendant could in no event engage in fishing until the season opened on August 6. Upon the second hearing held on August 4, plaintiff has shown that the defendant has reinstalled its trap in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mayo v. Lakeland Highlands Canning Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Harrisonville v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Ohio Oil Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Brown v. PurvinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rubinstein v. Brownell, Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  2. Rubinstein v. Brownell, Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API