Legal Opinion
State v. Farnum
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 9, 2005No. SC 17254PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The state appeals, following our grant of certification to appeal, from the Appellate Court’s judgment reversing the conviction of the defendant, William Famum, on one count of robbery in the first degree and one count of larceny in the third degree. State v. Farnum, 83 Conn. App. 326,849 A.2d 393 (2004). The state claims that the Appellate Court improperly concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support the defendant’s conviction of those charges. We agree with the state, and, accordingly, we reverse in part the judgment of the Appellate Court.
The following…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. BeaversSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. MorelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. NelsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.