Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Rhodes & Daniel

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1909No. 1908PublishedCited by 61 opinions

Question certified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth District, in an appeal from Red River County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

Certified question from the Court of Civil Appeals of the Sixth District, as follows:

“In the above styled cause appellants, plaintiffs in the trial court, by their action commenced November 14, 1906, among other things sought to recover, as against appellees, damages for deceit alleged to have been practiced on them by appellees in the sale to them of 1,808 acres of land in Red River County. From the allegations in the plaintiffs’ petition it appeared that in January, 1902, Hocker and Cheatham, owning the 1,808 acres, and being anxious to sell same for $10,000, arranged with appellees to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mellinger v. City of Houston (Tex. 1-18-1887)Texas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Smith v. FlyTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Cooper v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  4. Bass v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Robinson v. VarnellTexas Supreme Court · 1856

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Williams v. KhalafTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Quinn v. PressTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Elder, Dempster & Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Cavitt v. AmslerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. American Indemnity Co. v. Ernst & ErnstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API