Legal Opinion

Klamath Land & Cattle Co. v. Roemer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 1970No. Civ. 1239PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GINSBURG, J. *

This action involves the title to oil and mineral interests in real property situate in Merced County. It was commenced by the present owner of the surface rights, respondent herein, who filed a complaint against appellant, and others, to quiet title to all rights in the land. All named defendants except appellant Frank L. Roemer disclaimed or defaulted. Appellant cross-complained to quiet title to an undivided one-fourth interest in the subsurface rights, and appeals from the adverse judgment of the trial court quieting respondent’s title.

The case was tried upon agreed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Johnston v. LanducciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Carlson v. LindauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Graff v. MiddletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Henderson v. FieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Foad Consulting Group, Inc. v. Musil Govan AzzalinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Noronha v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Foad Consulting Group, Inc. v. AzzalinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Schwenn v. KayeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Aflague v. MoylanSuperior Court of Guam · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API