Ferrell v. Durham Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
"WiNBORNE, J.
In the light of the factual situation presented in the record on this appeal, the ruling of the trial court follows a principle of law well established in this and other jurisdictions.
It is a general rule of law that where one conveys a part of his estate, he impliedly grants all those apparent or visible easements upon the part retained which were at the time used by the grantor for the benefit of the part conveyed, and which are reasonably necessary for the use of that part. Jones on Easements, section 129; Washburn on Easements, 3rd Ed., p. 41; 17 Am. Jur., 945, Easements,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hunt v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Burling v. LeiterMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Carmon v. . DickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Irvine v. McCrearyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
- Bowling v. . BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rischall v. BauchmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Spruill v. NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Packard v. . SmartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Packard v. SmartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Waters v. North Carolina Phosphate Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.