Legal Opinion

Alabama v. Woodard

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 2, 2003No. CR-02-2177PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioner, David Woodard, filed this petition for a writ of mandamus directing Judge Robert Earl Wilters to grant his motion to “redact” a portion of Woodard’s statement this Court has previously held was improperly admitted in Woodard’s first trial.1 Woodard was convicted of felony murder, and he appealed that conviction to this Court. We reversed Woodard’s conviction and ordered a new trial. Woodard v. State, 846 So.2d 1102 (Ala.Crim.App.2002). We held that the trial court erroneously admitted a portion of Woodard’s statement that referred to a prior criminal act — a killing in North…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. State v. OwenSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  5. Hull v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walden v. Es Capital, 1091474 (Ala. 5-20-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  2. Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  3. Corey Lee Walton v. State of AlabamaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API