Cal Fire Local 2881 v. Cal. Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChin, J.
CORRIGAN, J.
LIU, J.
CUÉLLAR, J.
KRUGER, J.
ZELON, J.*
KRUGER, J.
I concur in the majority opinion, which I have signed. I write separately to expand briefly on a key element of the analysis: why the opportunity to purchase additional retirement service (ARS) credits was not an employment benefit that vested by implication, as were the pension benefits at issue in **455Betts v. Board of Administration (1978) 21 Cal.3d 859, 148 Cal.Rptr. 158, 582 P.2d 614, Kern v. City of Long Beach (1947) 29 Cal.2d 848, 179 P.2d 799, and similar cases.
Our cases concerning the vesting of public employee pension…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- McGrath v. Rhode Island Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gaylan Harris v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Stoetzl v. Dept. of Human ResourcesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Peter Metcalfe, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Paxton v. Bd. of Admin., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Alameda County Deputy etc. v. Alameda County Employees' etc.California Supreme Court · 2020
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.