Legal Opinion
Paxton v. Bd. of Admin.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided April 23, 2019No. C086204PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtRenner, J.
*555Plaintiff Dr. Robert Paxton reviews claims for disability benefits for the Department of Social Services, where he is still employed. This dispute arose after the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) determined that compensation Paxton received as part of a bonus program will not be considered when calculating his future pension benefit. This appeal is taken from a judgment denying his petition for writ of administrative mandamus challenging a decision by the Board of Administration of CalPERS upholding this interpretation. The trial court's *556conclusion that the bonuses…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Sacramento v. Public Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Cal Fire Local 2881 v. Cal. Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys.California Supreme Court · 2019
- Marin Ass'n of Public Employees v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Epstein v. Vision Service PlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020