Stoetzl v. Dept. of Human Resources
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOpinion of the Court by Chin, J.
In this case, we decide whether a certified class of state correctional employees is entitled to additional compensation for time spent on pre- and postwork activities, including traveling from the outermost gate of the prison facility to their work posts within the facility, traveling back from their work posts to the outermost gate, being briefed before the start of a shift, briefing relief staff at the end of a shift, checking out and checking back in mandated safety equipment, putting on and removing such equipment, and submitting to searches at various security checkpoints within the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Assn. for L.A. Deputy Sheriffs v. County of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Barriga v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Barriga v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Bath v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2024
- Dept. of Human Resources v. Cal. Correctional Peace Officers etc.California Court of Appeal · 2026
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.