Legal Opinion
Richins v. Mayfield
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1973No. 9653PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARTINEZ, Justice.
Plaintiffs filed suit on April 28, 1971 in the District Court of Hidalgo County, New Mexico alleging that the defendants had failed to make the necessary payments due under the terms of a purchase and sales contract for land in Hidalgo County. Plaintiffs prayed for a judgment of the balance due under the terms of the contract. On June 18, 1971, a default judgment was entered against two of the defendants, J. Max Beene and Charlotte J. Beene, his wife, in the amount of $38,391.84.
The pleadings and record reveal the following facts. On July 8, 1971, the defendant, J.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pellegrino v. NesbitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- United States Casualty Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Lebeck v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- American Trust & Savings Bank v. ScobeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Gary v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- C.E. Alexander & Sons, Inc. v. DEC International, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- United Salt Corp. v. McKeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Holguin v. Elephant Butte Irrigation DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Apodaca v. Town of Tome Land GrantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Losey v. Norwest Bank of New Mexico, N.A.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.