Legal Opinion
United States Casualty Co. v. Taylor
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 4, 1933No. 3410, 3411PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
No. 3410.
The question in this ease is whether the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’' Compensation Act of March 4, 1927, e. 509, 44 Stat. 1424, 33 USCA §§ 901 to 950, covers the ease of a workman who has been injured while engaged in the construction of a new ship that has been launched and nearly but not quite completed. On February 27, 1930, Robert A. Taylor, an employee of the Charleston Dry Dock & Machine Company at Charleston, S. C., was engaged in drilling holes for the placing of lights on the mast of U. S. lightship No. 115, a vessel which the company was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- United States v. Anthony P. Perry v. Tryllous Hossler, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Pellegrino v. NesbitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.